The Pros And Cons Of Owning A Sex Doll
From a social and legal perspective, the topic of sex doll ownership is increasingly being discussed. This study was designed to test the credibility of the existing psychological, sexuality, and legal literature related to Love Doll ownership.
latest discovery
There are many opinions on the range of possible socio-legal positions on sex doll ownership. However, there is little empirical analysis on the psychological characteristics or behavioral consequences of real-life doll ownership. Instead, the existing arguments represent the philosophical positions of scientists without any objective evidence.
Own a realistic sex doll
The sale of realistic human imitations in the form of sex dolls for sexual play is backed by a multi-million dollar global industry. Some models have artificial intelligence and the ability to communicate falsely with their owners, known as sex robots.
This has led to increased academic, social and legal attention. The law also covers dangerous high quality sex dolls. A 2020 study (Craig A. Harpercor and Rebecca Lievesley) looked at the motivations behind owning sex dolls. The author raises interesting questions.
Who is the (potential) owner of the sex doll?
Currently, these man-made objects appear to be primarily sexual, which may limit our understanding of the motivations behind wanting to have them. About 70 percent of sex doll owners said sexual satisfaction was their doll's primary function, but others said their doll was a form of companionship and a substitute for companionship.
Even among those who said their doll's primary purpose was sex, more than 80 percent of the time, having a FJ Doll was accompanied by other functions. The illusion of intimacy underlies their strong bond with the robot.
The alleged consequences and effects of owning a sex doll
Researchers in bioethics, sociology, robotics and law have expressed concern that sex dolls and robots encourage the sexual objectification of women and reinforce traditional standards of beauty and perceptions of attractiveness.
The result is a loss of human intimacy and connection in sexual interactions. In extreme cases, possession of sex dolls can lead to the promotion of sexual violence against women, high quality sexual abuse and paedophilia.
The programmability of sex robots allows their owners to essentially practice rape. However, possession of sex dolls has not been proven to lead to sexual assault. It also raises questions about whether raping a robot is a crime.
It is believed that interaction with high quality sex dolls can increase the likelihood of high quality sexual abuse by desensitizing doll users to the physical, emotional and psychological harm of high quality sexual abuse and normalizing the abuser's behavior.
At the same time, however, there is no evidence of a therapeutic benefit from the use of high quality sex dolls. This also applies to relationships with women. Therefore, both the negative and positive effects of Cheap Sex Doll are unproven because it has not been studied.
In addition to the potential risks associated with sex doll ownership and robot ownership, the study examines positive effects. Controlled use of dolls in sexual and relationship counseling will make it possible to study the effectiveness of dolls in relieving sexual dysfunction.
The use of high quality sex dolls in establishments designed to prevent sexual abuse of persons who are sexually attractive to high quality is controversial.
Case studies of this practice should be evaluated to clarify controversies and unanswered questions. Sex dolls and robots may play a potential role in relieving social and emotional isolation and treating sexual dysfunction in medical and mental health settings.
Analysis conclusion
The purpose of this study is to present the development of arguments in the existing literature on the motivations and effects of owning real dolls and sex robots. Subsequently, using findings from social, cognitive, and evolutionary psychology, as well as current theories on the etiology of sexual crime, demonstrated a lack of empirical research on the topic.
The current conclusions are based on ideological starting points that are inconsistent with the oft-cited risks. Social and legal professionals should conduct more empirical research on this increasingly controversial social issue.
